Do You Need a LIM?
17 December 2024

If you’re buying property, whether it be a residential house, a commercial property, or bare land, do you need a LIM?


A LIM, or, to use its full name, a Land Information Memorandum, is a report prepared by a territorial authority or a district council (council) under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 about a property. A LIM can contain useful information held by council about the subject property and is commonly reviewed as part of any due diligence investigation on a prospective purchase, along with a review of the agreement for sale and purchase, record of title and other investigations.


Section 44A of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 lists the types of information that must be included in a LIM such as:

  • information identifying special features or characteristics of the land (such as, potential erosion, subsidence or instability, or contamination) that are known to the council;
  • information about private and public stormwater and wastewater drains shown in the council’s records;
  • information about water supply;
  • information about rates;
  • whether the land is located in a levy area under the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Act 2020, and, if so, the levy period and amount;
  • whether the land is subject to a targeted rate order under the Urban Development Act 2020, and, if so, the rating period and amount;
  • information relating to building consents and code compliance certificates issued by the council;
  • information relating to resource consents and other licences or permits issued by the council;
  • information notified to the council under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006;
  • information relating to the use to which the land may be put and conditions attached to that use; that is, the district plan; and
  • information notified to the council by a network utility operator.


The council may include other information at its discretion. It is important to note that a LIM does not include information held about a property by a local authority or regional council. Nor does it contain information about adjoining or adjacent land.


Key information for a purchaser in a LIM can include:-


  • whether the land is prone to instability, liquefaction, or flooding (including overland flows);
  • whether there is public water supply, stormwater, or wastewater infrastructure (or other public infrastructure) under the property;
    • whether code compliance certificates have been issued for all consented building work; and
    • whether there are any plan changes that may affect the current zoning of the property.
  • Given the breadth of information contained in a LIM, we recommend you do obtain a LIM as part of any due diligence before you buy a property or before you make your sale and purchase agreement unconditional. The information contained in the LIM may help you decide whether the property is, in fact, fit for intended use, or highlight matters that need to be brought to the attention of your lender and/or insurer.


In many cases, vendors or real estate agents will get a LIM themselves as part of their marketing process and will provide you with a copy for you to pass onto your legal advisor to review. However, as these LIMs are addressed to the vendor or agent, if there is anything contained in the LIM that is not accurate, you will have no recourse against the council – only the party to whom the LIM is addressed has any rights. We, therefore, strongly recommend you get your own LIM. Ask us to order one on your behalf.


If you are looking to buy a property and are thinking about what due diligence you should be undertaking, we would love to help you. For more information, please contact Danielle Moore.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Meet Zak Nasir

31 August 2026
We're pleased to introduce Zak Nasir , Senior Associate in our Land Development and Commercial Property team. Zak brings a unique blend of legal and planning expertise, helping clients navigate some of New Zealand's most complex property and development projects. With extensive experience in land development, subdivisions, commercial property and resource management matters, Zak advises developers, private clients and infrastructure providers on all aspects of property acquisition, development structuring, subdivision, leasing and disposal. His practice spans projects of all sizes, from boutique developments through to major residential subdivisions involving hundreds of lots. Before becoming a lawyer, Zak worked as a town planner, giving him a valuable understanding of the planning and development process. This background allows him to identify potential issues early and provide commercially focused, practical advice throughout the life of a project. Clients and colleagues alike value his ability to bridge legal, planning and development considerations to achieve successful outcomes. He has previously worked in London as a lawyer and most recently at a large top tier firm in Auckland. Throughout his career, Zak has advised on significant commercial property transactions, large-scale development projects, leasing arrangements and Public Works Act matters. He is known for his pragmatic approach and his ability to work collaboratively with surveyors, engineers, planners and government agencies to resolve complex issues efficiently. Whether assisting first-time developers or experienced industry participants, Zak is committed to delivering clear, practical solutions that help clients move forward with confidence. We are delighted to have him as part of the Glaister Keegan team and look forward to the continued value he brings to our clients and colleagues. Contact: zak.nasir@glaister.co.nz

Proposed Reform of the Holidays Act continued

31 August 2026
Alternative Holidays Current system If the full-time employee works on a public holiday that is an OWD, they get one full alternative holiday , no matter how many hours they worked. The full-time employee must take their leave on another OWD. The full-time employee can cash their leave up after 12 months. Proposed new system The full-time employee earns alternative holiday hours , matching the number of hours they worked (or were on call and called in) on the public holiday. The full-time employee can take the hours on any day they could normally work . The full-time employee can cash their hours up at any time . Leave Payments Current system Leave payments require multiple calculations to account for variable hours and payments. Annual leave taken soon after parental or volunteer leave is paid at a lower rate . Proposed new system All leave is paid at an hourly rate , based on the lowest hourly rate payable for the day the leave is taken plus an average for piece‑rate work. Fixed allowances are paid in full during leave. Annual leave after parental or volunteer leave is paid normally . Leave Compensation Payments (Replacing “Pay as You Go”) Current system Employers and workers can agree to “Pay as You Go” (8% of gross earnings) for casual short‑term work. Proposed new system A Leave Compensation Payment (LCP) of 12.5% of a worker’s ordinary hourly rate is paid on all casual hours . Workers with standard hours also get LCP on additional hours they work, instead of accruing annual or sick leave on those hours. Fixed‑term workers earn leave from day one .

AI and the Law: Embracing Change, Protecting Trust

31 August 2026
Artificial intelligence ( AI ) is no longer a futuristic idea knocking at the door of legal practice. It is already here. For lawyers, the challenge is not simply to use AI, but to use it responsibly, carefully, and in a way that genuinely benefits clients. In broad terms, AI can process, organise, and generate information at speed. In legal practice, that can be valuable. AI can assist with first drafts of correspondence, summarising lengthy emails or documents, preparing chronologies, comparing versions of agreements, identifying recurring clauses, and improving the clarity of client updates. For example, a lawyer reviewing a large chain of correspondence may use AI to prepare an initial summary of key dates and issues. A commercial lawyer may use it to highlight changes between document versions. A litigator may use it to organise background material before preparing advice. Used properly, AI can reduce time spent on repetitive tasks and allow lawyers to focus on judgment, strategy, and client service. However, AI is not a lawyer in disguise. It can produce inaccurate material, miss context, reflect bias, orgenerate confident-sounding answers that are wrong. In legal practice, there are also serious risks around privacy, confidentiality, professional responsibility, and over-reliance. AI may assist with the heavy lifting, but lawyers must still hold the pen. At Glaister Keegan Lawyers, our AI journey is guided by a balance of innovation and discipline. The firm has developed an artificial intelligence policy to guide the responsible, ethical, and practical use of AI. The policy includes strict requirements relating to privacy, confidentiality, competence, professional responsibility, and verification. Client confidentiality remains fundamental. The firm will take a careful and measured approach to the use of AI tools. Any AI tool used by the firm must provide appropriate safeguards for privacy, confidentiality and information security. This means adopting tools and processes that support the secure handling of client information, controlled access, and responsible use, while maintaining the standards of care, confidentiality, and professionalism our clients expect. Our staff are receiving appropriate guidance and training on the responsible use of AI tools, including their limitations and the circumstances in which they may be used. All AI-generated output will be checked by our staff before being used or relied upon. In short, we are embracing AI, but with the guardrails firmly in place. For us, AI is not about replacing people with prompts. It is about equipping our lawyers to work more efficiently, think more clearly, and continue delivering practical, trusted legal advice in a changing world.  About the Author - Adrian Sharma is a qualified Fiji lawyer and our AML Compliance Officer. As he works towards requalifying in New Zealand, he continues to contribute his strong legal and compliance knowledge, with a keen interest in how emerging technologies such as AI are shaping the future of business and professional services.
Show More