Leasehold Land
29 November 2024

Did you know there are several different types of residential properties in New Zealand? It is, therefore, imperative you undertake your due diligence before entering into an unconditional agreement to purchase a property. Ensure the property is the right type of property for you; regardless whether it be freehold, cross lease, a unit title, or leasehold property.


Leasehold is a less common type of property in New Zealand. More often than not, you will find leasehold properties are apartments or properties nearer the waterfront, particularly in Auckland around the Viaduct and Mission Bay areas. 


What do I need to know before purchasing a leasehold property?


When purchasing a leasehold property, you purchase an exclusive right to possession and occupation of the land and the buildings situated thereon for a specific period of time. You are not purchasing the land and buildings outright. These remain the property of the freehold owner (generally known as the “landowner”).


A lease document will be registered on the Record of Title for the property. It is important you understand this document as it will set out the term of the lease, the amount of rent payable by you, how and when rent reviews can be undertaken, and the obligations imposed upon you as the leasehold owner.


The term of the lease can vary from a few years, to decades, to 100+ years. Your legal advisor will review the lease document to ascertain the term of the lease and advise you on it.

Leasehold properties that have leases for a longer period of time are generally more expensive to purchase than those with a shorter lease because you are buying the right to possess and use the property for a longer period of time.


The “leaseholder”, being the purchaser and owner of the leasehold property, will be responsible for payment of regular ground rent payments to the landowner. The amount of ground rent payable will be stipulated in the lease, together with details of any rent reviews the landowner may be entitled to undertake. In addition to the ground rent, operating expenses, which include rates, are payable, and, if the property is a unit title, body corporate fees and insurance are payable. Some leases are fully prepaid to the end of the lease term with no right of renewal.


In terms of rent reviews, these could be minimal or drastic. The valuation of the property may determine the review of the ground rent, and, therefore, if, say, the rent is only reviewed every twenty years, it is likely to increase more drastically because the capital value of the property would have increased significantly over that twenty-year period as well. In some cases, rent is increased so significantly owners cannot afford to pay it, leaving them no option but to abandon the property: they lose their home as well as the money they invested in it (including the purchase price they paid for the leasehold interest as well as any maintenance and improvement costs). The rent reviews can be subject to mediation or arbitration if the leaseholder feels the rental is unfairly increased. But, this can be a costly and lengthy exercise.

The closer the rental term is to ending, the harder it will be to sell the property; especially if, there is no right of renewal of the ground lease. For example, a lease with 75 years to run may fetch a good price now, but, when there is only 17 years remaining for the lease to run, the sale price may be substantially less.


So, why do people continue to purchase leasehold properties, rather than rent? What are the pros and cons of purchasing leasehold property?


In the long run, it is possible purchasing leasehold property could be cheaper than renting. Although, you are paying an outright amount for the initial lease, the ground rent may be cheap which could be more cost effective than renting.


Leasehold properties are also generally cheaper to purchase than other types of property (such as freehold) as you are only purchasing an exclusive right to possess the land and buildings, rather than purchasing the land and buildings themselves. This makes it more affordable to purchase property in more desirable and sought-after areas, such as inner-city or waterfront locations. Properties in those locations would cost significantly more to purchase if they were freehold.


Also, if you purchase a leasehold property and later sell it for a profit, you would benefit from the gain that you have made. You would also not be subject to regular landlord inspections of the property as you would if you were a tenant.


However, it is important you understand the potential cons of purchasing a leasehold property. The rent can be increased when a rent review is due. As mentioned above, rent reviews can be substantial. It is important you discuss the terms of the lease with your legal advisor; so that, you understand what the current rental is, when it was last reviewed, when the rental is due to be reviewed next, and what the rental increase could potentially look like. In some instances, the ground rent may be minimal. And, there may be no provision for rent reviews in the lease, which would make the property more affordable and which would give you certainty to allow for long-term financial planning. Alternatively, the rental could be fully prepaid to the end of the lease term.


Owning a leasehold property could also be seen as owning a “dwindling asset”: if you have obtained mortgage finance to purchase the property, you will be required to repay the mortgage together with the ground rental and rates. At the end of the term of the lease, you won’t have anything to show for it other than any capital gain you may make on the sale of the lease. Some mortgagees will only lend a lesser percentage on leasehold properties rather than on freehold, but this is something you may need to check with your lender. 


Leasehold properties can be more difficult to sell than other types of properties; particularly as, they are a less common property type. Therefore, many people are not familiar with the concept of leasehold. This should be taken into consideration if you are looking to purchase a leasehold property and do not envisage owning it for a substantial period of time.


What happens at the end of the term of the lease?


If the term of the lease is reached without it being extended, the leasehold owner would pass the keys back to the landowner, who would then be able to decide what they wish to do with the property. As the leasehold owner, you are not paid out any money when the property is returned, and the lease comes to an end. 


If you are looking to purchase a property in New Zealand, whether it be leasehold or any other type of property, we would be delighted to assist you. For more information, please contact Danielle Moore.


31 August 2026
We're pleased to introduce Zak Nasir , Senior Associate in our Land Development and Commercial Property team. Zak brings a unique blend of legal and planning expertise, helping clients navigate some of New Zealand's most complex property and development projects. With extensive experience in land development, subdivisions, commercial property and resource management matters, Zak advises developers, private clients and infrastructure providers on all aspects of property acquisition, development structuring, subdivision, leasing and disposal. His practice spans projects of all sizes, from boutique developments through to major residential subdivisions involving hundreds of lots. Before becoming a lawyer, Zak worked as a town planner, giving him a valuable understanding of the planning and development process. This background allows him to identify potential issues early and provide commercially focused, practical advice throughout the life of a project. Clients and colleagues alike value his ability to bridge legal, planning and development considerations to achieve successful outcomes. He has previously worked in London as a lawyer and most recently at a large top tier firm in Auckland. Throughout his career, Zak has advised on significant commercial property transactions, large-scale development projects, leasing arrangements and Public Works Act matters. He is known for his pragmatic approach and his ability to work collaboratively with surveyors, engineers, planners and government agencies to resolve complex issues efficiently. Whether assisting first-time developers or experienced industry participants, Zak is committed to delivering clear, practical solutions that help clients move forward with confidence. We are delighted to have him as part of the Glaister Keegan team and look forward to the continued value he brings to our clients and colleagues. Contact: zak.nasir@glaister.co.nz
31 August 2026
Alternative Holidays Current system If the full-time employee works on a public holiday that is an OWD, they get one full alternative holiday , no matter how many hours they worked. The full-time employee must take their leave on another OWD. The full-time employee can cash their leave up after 12 months. Proposed new system The full-time employee earns alternative holiday hours , matching the number of hours they worked (or were on call and called in) on the public holiday. The full-time employee can take the hours on any day they could normally work . The full-time employee can cash their hours up at any time . Leave Payments Current system Leave payments require multiple calculations to account for variable hours and payments. Annual leave taken soon after parental or volunteer leave is paid at a lower rate . Proposed new system All leave is paid at an hourly rate , based on the lowest hourly rate payable for the day the leave is taken plus an average for piece‑rate work. Fixed allowances are paid in full during leave. Annual leave after parental or volunteer leave is paid normally . Leave Compensation Payments (Replacing “Pay as You Go”) Current system Employers and workers can agree to “Pay as You Go” (8% of gross earnings) for casual short‑term work. Proposed new system A Leave Compensation Payment (LCP) of 12.5% of a worker’s ordinary hourly rate is paid on all casual hours . Workers with standard hours also get LCP on additional hours they work, instead of accruing annual or sick leave on those hours. Fixed‑term workers earn leave from day one .
31 August 2026
Artificial intelligence ( AI ) is no longer a futuristic idea knocking at the door of legal practice. It is already here. For lawyers, the challenge is not simply to use AI, but to use it responsibly, carefully, and in a way that genuinely benefits clients. In broad terms, AI can process, organise, and generate information at speed. In legal practice, that can be valuable. AI can assist with first drafts of correspondence, summarising lengthy emails or documents, preparing chronologies, comparing versions of agreements, identifying recurring clauses, and improving the clarity of client updates. For example, a lawyer reviewing a large chain of correspondence may use AI to prepare an initial summary of key dates and issues. A commercial lawyer may use it to highlight changes between document versions. A litigator may use it to organise background material before preparing advice. Used properly, AI can reduce time spent on repetitive tasks and allow lawyers to focus on judgment, strategy, and client service. However, AI is not a lawyer in disguise. It can produce inaccurate material, miss context, reflect bias, orgenerate confident-sounding answers that are wrong. In legal practice, there are also serious risks around privacy, confidentiality, professional responsibility, and over-reliance. AI may assist with the heavy lifting, but lawyers must still hold the pen. At Glaister Keegan Lawyers, our AI journey is guided by a balance of innovation and discipline. The firm has developed an artificial intelligence policy to guide the responsible, ethical, and practical use of AI. The policy includes strict requirements relating to privacy, confidentiality, competence, professional responsibility, and verification. Client confidentiality remains fundamental. The firm will take a careful and measured approach to the use of AI tools. Any AI tool used by the firm must provide appropriate safeguards for privacy, confidentiality and information security. This means adopting tools and processes that support the secure handling of client information, controlled access, and responsible use, while maintaining the standards of care, confidentiality, and professionalism our clients expect. Our staff are receiving appropriate guidance and training on the responsible use of AI tools, including their limitations and the circumstances in which they may be used. All AI-generated output will be checked by our staff before being used or relied upon. In short, we are embracing AI, but with the guardrails firmly in place. For us, AI is not about replacing people with prompts. It is about equipping our lawyers to work more efficiently, think more clearly, and continue delivering practical, trusted legal advice in a changing world.  About the Author - Adrian Sharma is a qualified Fiji lawyer and our AML Compliance Officer. As he works towards requalifying in New Zealand, he continues to contribute his strong legal and compliance knowledge, with a keen interest in how emerging technologies such as AI are shaping the future of business and professional services.
Show More