The Importance of Enduring Powers of Attorney
5 October 2026

Many people spend time preparing a will, but far fewer consider what would happen if they were still alive but unable to make decisions for themselves. An Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA) is an important legal document, which enables you to appoint another person (known as your attorney) to make decisions for you if you become mentally incapable of doing so yourself.

Like a will, an EPA can be updated as your circumstances change. Like insurance, an EPA may never be needed, but it provides important protection should the unexpected occur.

There are two types of EPA. The first relates to property and the second relates to personal care and welfare matters.


Property Attorney


Your property attorney will make decisions relating to financial assets; that is arranging benefits, paying bills, looking after bank accounts, and buying and selling assets (selling the family home to pay for care for example).


You can appoint any number of people to act as a property attorney together or separately, and/or appoint attorneys in succession if you think that is a sensible idea too.


You can also elect whether the EPA for property is to take effect immediately and then endure past the point you have lost capacity, or whether it is to take effect only in the situation where you have lost capacity. An EPA that takes effect immediately can be useful if you are travelling overseas or are physically unable to manage aspects of your affairs yourself. While you retain capacity and you remain able to continue managing your own affairs, your attorney’s role is generally to assist rather than take over.


Personal Care and Welfare


A personal care and welfare attorney will make decisions relating to your health and wellbeing such as your medical treatment, living situation, what level of care you receive, and the like.

 

You can only appoint one attorney at a time as a personal care and welfare attorney. However, like the EPA for property, you can also appoint attorneys in succession.


The EPA for personal care and welfare will only ever take effect in the situation where you have lost capacity.

 

What Happens if you do not have an EPA?


If you lose capacity and have not appointed an attorney, your spouse, partner, children, or relatives may discover they are unable to access bank accounts, manage investments, sell property, sign legal documents, or make certain healthcare decisions. This is mostly because financial institutions and government agencies generally require proper legal authority before allowing another person to act on your behalf.

Without an EPA, family members may need to apply to the Court for orders appointing a property manager to manage your financial affairs and/or a welfare guardian to make personal care and welfare decisions. This process can be a stressful, an expensive, and a time-consuming exercise at a time when stress levels are already high.

 

Things to Think About when Preparing your EPA


The sorts of things you need to think about when preparing your EPAs are:

  • Who you would want as your property attorney(s) and any successor attorneys.
  • Who you want as your personal care and welfare attorney and any successor attorneys.
  • Whether you wish to impose any conditions on your attorney.
  • Whether you wish to require your attorneys to consult or provide information to named persons.
  • In relation to your property attorney, whether you authorise your attorney to use your property for their own benefit or the benefit of any other person.
  • In relation to your property attorney, whether you authorise your attorney to use your property to provide gifts (either to family or charities).



It is also important to be aware your EPA needs to be signed and witnessed in the presence of either a lawyer, registered legal executive, or an authorised officer of a trustee corporation for your EPA to be valid.

 

Proposed Changes to the Legislation


The Law Commission has recommended replacing the current Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988, which governs EPAs, with an entirely new Act. The Government has accepted the central recommendation to replace the legislation and has indicated substantive reform work is a priority. We do not know precisely what those changes (if any) will look like, but the proposed reforms are summarised as follows:


  • More emphasis on your wishes: Under the current framework, attorneys are often guided by what they think is in your best interests. The proposed reforms would place much greater weight on your own wishes, values, beliefs, and preferences. That may mean that rather than simply appointing an attorney, you may be encouraged to leave more detailed guidance to your attorneys. The attorney’s role may be more focussed on carrying out what you would have wanted rather than them deciding what they think is best.
  • A new supporter role: The proposed reforms establish the creation of a formal supporter whose job is to help a person understand information, weigh options, and communicate decisions without actually making the decision for that person.
  • Capacity may be viewed more flexibly: The reforms recognise capacity is not always all or nothing. The new framework is expected to allow more tailored arrangements rather than completely removing a person’s decision-making authority.
  • Greater safeguards against abuse: Future reforms are likely to strengthen oversight and accountability for attorneys by introducing better record-keeping requirements, clearer obligations on attorneys, and potentially a voluntary register of EPAs.

 

Summary


EPAs are not just documents for the elderly. Accidents, illnesses, and unexpected medical events can affect anyone at any stage of life. By putting an EPA in place, you retain control over who will make decisions for you if you cannot make them yourself and, having EPAs in place, can reduce stress for your family in the event you lose the capacity to make decisions for yourself.


The Law Commission’s review of the legislation is a good reminder of just how important EPAs are, and we are of the view that ensuring they are in place is of the utmost importance. That being said, the current EPA system is effective and still one of the most important estate planning documents available. 

If you are interested in learning more about EPAs and the importance of them or would like to discuss putting them in place, please reach out to one of the team members at Glaister Keegan. We would be happy to assist you.

31 August 2026
We're pleased to introduce Zak Nasir , Senior Associate in our Land Development and Commercial Property team. Zak brings a unique blend of legal and planning expertise, helping clients navigate some of New Zealand's most complex property and development projects. With extensive experience in land development, subdivisions, commercial property and resource management matters, Zak advises developers, private clients and infrastructure providers on all aspects of property acquisition, development structuring, subdivision, leasing and disposal. His practice spans projects of all sizes, from boutique developments through to major residential subdivisions involving hundreds of lots. Before becoming a lawyer, Zak worked as a town planner, giving him a valuable understanding of the planning and development process. This background allows him to identify potential issues early and provide commercially focused, practical advice throughout the life of a project. Clients and colleagues alike value his ability to bridge legal, planning and development considerations to achieve successful outcomes. He has previously worked in London as a lawyer and most recently at a large top tier firm in Auckland. Throughout his career, Zak has advised on significant commercial property transactions, large-scale development projects, leasing arrangements and Public Works Act matters. He is known for his pragmatic approach and his ability to work collaboratively with surveyors, engineers, planners and government agencies to resolve complex issues efficiently. Whether assisting first-time developers or experienced industry participants, Zak is committed to delivering clear, practical solutions that help clients move forward with confidence. We are delighted to have him as part of the Glaister Keegan team and look forward to the continued value he brings to our clients and colleagues. Contact: zak.nasir@glaister.co.nz
31 August 2026
Alternative Holidays Current system If the full-time employee works on a public holiday that is an OWD, they get one full alternative holiday , no matter how many hours they worked. The full-time employee must take their leave on another OWD. The full-time employee can cash their leave up after 12 months. Proposed new system The full-time employee earns alternative holiday hours , matching the number of hours they worked (or were on call and called in) on the public holiday. The full-time employee can take the hours on any day they could normally work . The full-time employee can cash their hours up at any time . Leave Payments Current system Leave payments require multiple calculations to account for variable hours and payments. Annual leave taken soon after parental or volunteer leave is paid at a lower rate . Proposed new system All leave is paid at an hourly rate , based on the lowest hourly rate payable for the day the leave is taken plus an average for piece‑rate work. Fixed allowances are paid in full during leave. Annual leave after parental or volunteer leave is paid normally . Leave Compensation Payments (Replacing “Pay as You Go”) Current system Employers and workers can agree to “Pay as You Go” (8% of gross earnings) for casual short‑term work. Proposed new system A Leave Compensation Payment (LCP) of 12.5% of a worker’s ordinary hourly rate is paid on all casual hours . Workers with standard hours also get LCP on additional hours they work, instead of accruing annual or sick leave on those hours. Fixed‑term workers earn leave from day one .
31 August 2026
Artificial intelligence ( AI ) is no longer a futuristic idea knocking at the door of legal practice. It is already here. For lawyers, the challenge is not simply to use AI, but to use it responsibly, carefully, and in a way that genuinely benefits clients. In broad terms, AI can process, organise, and generate information at speed. In legal practice, that can be valuable. AI can assist with first drafts of correspondence, summarising lengthy emails or documents, preparing chronologies, comparing versions of agreements, identifying recurring clauses, and improving the clarity of client updates. For example, a lawyer reviewing a large chain of correspondence may use AI to prepare an initial summary of key dates and issues. A commercial lawyer may use it to highlight changes between document versions. A litigator may use it to organise background material before preparing advice. Used properly, AI can reduce time spent on repetitive tasks and allow lawyers to focus on judgment, strategy, and client service. However, AI is not a lawyer in disguise. It can produce inaccurate material, miss context, reflect bias, or generate confident-sounding answers that are wrong. In legal practice, there are also serious risks around privacy, confidentiality, professional responsibility, and over-reliance. AI may assist with the heavy lifting, but lawyers must still hold the pen. At Glaister Keegan Lawyers, our AI journey is guided by a balance of innovation and discipline. The firm has developed an artificial intelligence policy to guide the responsible, ethical, and practical use of AI. The policy includes strict requirements relating to privacy, confidentiality, competence, professional responsibility, and verification. Client confidentiality remains fundamental. The firm will take a careful and measured approach to the use of AI tools. Any AI tool used by the firm must provide appropriate safeguards for privacy, confidentiality and information security. This means adopting tools and processes that support the secure handling of client information, controlled access, and responsible use, while maintaining the standards of care, confidentiality, and professionalism our clients expect. Our staff are receiving appropriate guidance and training on the responsible use of AI tools, including their limitations and the circumstances in which they may be used. All AI-generated output will be checked by our staff before being used or relied upon. In short, we are embracing AI, but with the guardrails firmly in place. For us, AI is not about replacing people with prompts. It is about equipping our lawyers to work more efficiently, think more clearly, and continue delivering practical, trusted legal advice in a changing world. About the Author - Adrian Sharma is a qualified Fiji lawyer and our AML Compliance Officer. As he works towards requalifying in New Zealand, he continues to contribute his strong legal and compliance knowledge, with a keen interest in how emerging technologies such as AI are shaping the future of business and professional services.
Show More